Look at all options
Fans of “alternative energy” – more on the quote marks in a moment – have begun worrying aloud about President Donald Trump’s aversion to wind power. They fear it will affect federal energy policy.
It should not, of course, though it did during former President Barack Obama’s administration. You may remember that then, federal regulators were giving some wind turbine operators big breaks regarding laws intended to safeguard certain species of birds.
Trump has made no secret of his dislike for wind turbines. He has referred to them as “disgusting,” “ugly” and “stupid.” To date, however, there is no reason to believe federal policy has been affected.
Even in states where legislators have repealed laws requiring utilities to obtain electricity from “alternatives” such as wind and solar power, the big turbines with their whirring blades are going up at a rapid rate.
Abut 6.3% of the nation’s electricity now comes from wind turbines. In four states (Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma and South Dakota), that source accounts for 30% or more of power generation.
One estimate is that the current capacity for wind power generation is about 82,000 megawatts. That is the equivalent of about 136 coal-fired power plants.
Now, back to whether sources such as wind and solar power are true alternatives. They are not, in a very basic sense. When the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing, no electricity is generated from those sources.
Utilities cannot rely solely on such “alternatives.” They need reliable “baseload” generation that can be called upon at any time. For now, that means power plants fueled by natural gas, coal, nuclear energy or even oil.
Americans need an “all-of-the-above” energy policy dictated not by state or federal governments but by the marketplace and technological reality. During the Obama years, that fact – and it is one – was ignored. Trump’s administration seems to be moving back toward a more fact-based approach, and that is a good thing for the entire nation.